Really really cool, David. I wish Imrah had a web designer like you =)

Sid

Fabulous! Keep it up:)

David, I am a Jesus enthusiest, and you have some nice work here, I read your comment about evolution, where you said they say man evolved from apes, and said Have you told your child he was an ape.

Coming from is different than is.

I believe God did it all, but maybe Genesis chapter one is a metaphor. Salvation is not dependant upon a belief that Genesis 1 is not metaphorical, after all Revelation is.

Once you believe Genesis chapter one is metaphorical, then you can leave behind the arguements for creation-evolution and just say God did it, and let the scientists say how he did it. The atheists and scientists can never prove God did not do it. If they say it was random chance, then God was very awesome to be able to create something as powerful as random chance. The main message of course is everything after Genesis chapter 1

Thanks for the comment unimportant.

However, God did not use evolution - they are in complete contrast. To suggest that they worked "together" shows a lack of understanding of both concepts. The God that would use evolution would be 1) Cruel 2) Retarded and 3) Wasteful. The whole process of natural chance and selection is the slowest and dumbest of possible processes - in that it would require many deaths to achieve a correct result.

X-evolutionist - God and Evolution and www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v17/i1/god_evolution.asp have some great articles on this.

Why anyone would want to take a perfect theory like creation (which as never been proven wrong) and mix it with a faulty theory like evolution (which has never been proven right)?

vvgkrmznd1616iqn

I know this might be a late reply, but Genesis 1 is not metamorphical. Later in Exodus 20:11, Moses writes the creation of the earth as 6 days. Obviously, he meant 6 literal, human days. God created man in His image, Gods image did not grow in him through time. To say that a man was first a monkey or a ramathipica is to say God functioned like these animal-like creatures.

Sidharth

PS: David, I know you're a busy-bee, but update your sites bro

Really really cool, David. I wish Imrah had a web designer like you =)

Sid

Fabulous! Keep it up:)

David, I am a Jesus enthusiest, and you have some nice work here, I read your comment about evolution, where you said they say man evolved from apes, and said Have you told your child he was an ape.

Coming from is different than is.

I believe God did it all, but maybe Genesis chapter one is a metaphor. Salvation is not dependant upon a belief that Genesis 1 is not metaphorical, after all Revelation is.

Once you believe Genesis chapter one is metaphorical, then you can leave behind the arguements for creation-evolution and just say God did it, and let the scientists say how he did it. The atheists and scientists can never prove God did not do it. If they say it was random chance, then God was very awesome to be able to create something as powerful as random chance. The main message of course is everything after Genesis chapter 1

Thanks for the comment unimportant.

However, God did not use evolution - they are in complete contrast. To suggest that they worked "together" shows a lack of understanding of both concepts. The God that would use evolution would be 1) Cruel 2) Retarded and 3) Wasteful. The whole process of natural chance and selection is the slowest and dumbest of possible processes - in that it would require many deaths to achieve a correct result.

X-evolutionist - God and Evolution and www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v17/i1/god_evolution.asp have some great articles on this.

Why anyone would want to take a perfect theory like creation (which as never been proven wrong) and mix it with a faulty theory like evolution (which has never been proven right)?

vvgkrmznd1616iqn

I know this might be a late reply, but Genesis 1 is not metamorphical. Later in Exodus 20:11, Moses writes the creation of the earth as 6 days. Obviously, he meant 6 literal, human days. God created man in His image, Gods image did not grow in him through time. To say that a man was first a monkey or a ramathipica is to say God functioned like these animal-like creatures.

Sidharth

PS: David, I know you're a busy-bee, but update your sites bro